back

Henry Makow – Cognitive Dissonance Case Study

Henry Makow (Ph.D. in English Literature) is a Canadian conspiracy theorist, author, columnist, and inventor of the boardgame Scruples.

Makow postulates a hidden hand shaping modern history according to a long-term occult  (Satanic) agenda. He argues that democracy today is a charade and serves as an instrument of social control; the mass media generally stifles information and channels thought; and popular entertainment degrades us and diverts the audience from what is really happening.

The occult force, which operates through Freemasonry, is empowered by the London-based central banking cartel which must bring about world tyranny to defend its monopoly on credit.[citation needed] His most recent collection, Illuminati: The Cult that Hijacked the World (2008), documents this view of history.

He is the author of A Long Way to go for a Date (Winnipeg: Silas Green, 2000), the story of his courtship and marriage to a young Filipina. (He divorced and remarried in 2001.) His opinion that feminism is an attempt to destabilize society is found in his ‘Cruel Hoax: Feminism and the New World Order.

He believes the Protocols of the Elders of Zion are authentic and are the blueprint of the New World Order. However, he stated that he believes they represent the goals of a small cabal of Masonic Jews, central bankers who direct organized Jewry, but not Jews in general. He argues that terms such as “tolerance” and “diversity” are social engineering by this powerful cabal:

‘Tolerance’ shames us into giving up our humanity. Let’s resist by strengthening our identities: heterosexuality, nation, religion and race, respecting but not deferring to others. The real tolerance does not come from erasing differences but in upholding them, in loving others for their unique qualities, and being proud of our own.”[2]

First contact: November 5, 2009
From: Henry Makow To: Robert Singer
Subject: Re: Submission: The Great Foreclosure Robbery Of The 21st Century

Robert

Your conclusion doesn’t fit your point which is that foreclosures are unnecessary and wasteful.  Please elaborate on why they are doing this. And I will send to Rense. The Michael Moore part is a second article. henry

Reply From: Robert Singer
Subject: Re: Submission: The Great Foreclosure Robbery Of The 21st Century

thank you for writing.

I was making the point that Foreclosures are their goal. Nothing to do with unnecessary or being wasteful: someone wants to create unemployment and empty houses.

2010 Cognitive Dissonance

Henry, here is where I think we are:

You were interested in writing your own short and pithy tabloid version of Liberté, Enlightenté, Entitleté and then changed your mind when you read it (again), because “it was basically a rehash of Carrington Hitchcock.”

Since it is my belief that I am the only one in the world writing about:

[Excerpt from Something Is Wrong With This Picture: Ominous For Sure! (Update)]

  • Metaphysical struggle between The Powers That Be (TPTB) and mother-earth (Gaea). I maintain we passed the “unknown points of no return” because The House of Rothschild, in a metaphysical war with mother-earth (Gaea), until October 2008, was using humans to weaken the planet with environmental damage and pollution. Therefore the unprecedented environmental damage and pollution on Earth was the goal and not the unintended consequence of our consumer society. The Question of Questions
  • Federal Reserve isn’t evil because they print our money and make us pay interest they are evil because TPTB, Rockefeller, Kuhn, Loeb and Morgan, all connected to the House of Rothschild’s global financial empire are in struggle to weaken the earth with environmental damage and pollution so they can attain immortality in a The New World Order (Millennium).
  • Scofield Bible, WW I, WWII and the Holocaust were required to get the Jews to the Modern State of Israel in 1947 because it was a condition precedent to win the New World Order .The Key to the Secret of the Universe, Part 2

And there are only three outcomes to this galactic metaphysical struggle that goes back, at least, to the Dark Ages: (The Question of Questions)

  1. Gaea determines man’s future.
  2. TPTB determine man’s future in a new World Order where they attain immortality and rid the planet of all but 500 million useful eaters.
  3. TPTP are defeated (As I claim they were October 2008) and have three choices:
    1. The dragon, that ancient serpent, who is the devil, or Satan (TPTB) can accept defeat and agree to be tossed into the Abyss, be locked up for a 1000 years and then thrown into the Lake of Fire.
    2. Make good on a threat of total world annihilation (i.e. Nagasaki and Hiroshima) and spend a 1000 years in the 700-acre, secret subterranean city, deep within the bedrock underneath Central Park in Manhattan (Manhattan Project). This assumes Gaea allows them to launch WWIII. [4]
    3. Continue to drill holes in the earth (Perpetual Check) prolonging the inevitable looking for a heretofore-undiscovered vulnerability in the Earth’s crust.

Since the metaphysical struggle is OVER, the TPTP lost and are in perpetual check (An Ominous Drilling Sign for the Truth)

Furthermore, I believe the only thing we can do to help the earth is try and figure out WTF Kerry Cassidy is talking about when she says:

“If you want to give your energy… and power and light and love to the Illuminati”, to stop the Illuminati from unleashing total world annihilation, “know what you are doing, be conscious while you are doing it.”

[End of Excerpt]

Then Henry, I am very interested in reading anything that either supports or contradicts my theory.

I researched Carrington Hitchcock and could not find anything similar to my observations about the history of mankind or specifically the following:

[Excerpt from Liberté, Enlightenté, Entitleté]

  • The Rothschild’s revolutions took the real wealth of the world from the monarchs (kings, queens, emperors, empresses) in Europe, China, Russia, America and transferred it in theory to the profane (common man).
  • The “transfers” under the guise of “isms”, (i.e. Communism, Socialism, Capitalism) were initially republican form of governments “of and by and for the people” later converted to, according to John Adams, second US president, the “tyranny of the majority”, a “democracy”.

Although it is common knowledge that the Illuminati and therefore, the House of Rothschild is behind The Declaration of the Rights of Man, LINK), it is my contention until I wrote Liberté, Enlightenté, Entitleté NO one had made the following:

The profane middle class, thanks to the House of Rothschild are afflicted with The Narcissism Epidemic: Living in the Age of Entitlement [5] throughout the last 200 years, rant the same mantra:

Instead of meeting the needs of the people, the private credit monopoly of rich and predatory moneylenders are preying upon the people for the benefit of themselves.

We the people (former serfs, servants and slaves) are not only entitled to be fed, clothed and car-ed but our civil rights include being cur-ed: We are entitled to health care too!

Preoccupied with expanding our basic rights, we don’t want to know:

Why are we (in the East-West) so rich at the expense of them, who are so poor (in the North-South)? The Question of Questions

Because if we did, we might realize we have been ”had,” or ”conned,” into shopping for stuff to trash the planet.

Then we would be growing our own food, instead of sitting around Starbucks with our outsized sense of entitlement wondering if our ego will be satisfied with a new car and trying to decide if an SUV or station wagon will make us look fat or if an SUV is a fat station wagon.

There are only three possibilities why the Rothschilds put the planet at the “unknown points of no return” and the first two make no sense:

1.    TPTB are inept, clueless or just “stupid” because since 1910 the House of Rothschild and the evil robber barons behind our Federal Reserve have exchanged their real wealth for $600 trillion of fiat currency (Monopoly Money) they printed so former members of the Third Estate (serfs and slaves) could have houses, cars, RVs, TVs and DVDs—the “stuff” which put the planet, at the “unknown points of no return”.

2.    TPTB are really benevolent and wanted their former serfs, servants and slaves to have the highest standard of living for the last 100 years and didn’t know the planet would be in “dire environmental straits because humanity’s footprint [its environmental demand] is 21.9 hectares per person while the Earth’s biological capacity is, on average, only 15.7 ha/person.”

We passed the “unknown points of no return” because The House of Rothschild, in a metaphysical war with mother-earth (Gaea), until October 2008, was using humans to weaken the planet with environmental damage and pollution.

Should their plan succeed, TPTB believe, they will attain immortality in a period known as the Millennium, a thousand years of peace, plenty and paradise on Earth in a New World Order for the House of Rothschild, the Bilderbergers, the CFR and other secret societies (An Ominous Drilling Sign for the Truth). [End of Excerpt]

Your response:

Yes- the Protocols of Zion make the same point. Congrats!

It appears you agreed that I did not get my ideas from Carrington but “the Protocols of Zion make the same point.”

I next tried to use what’s left of my eyesight to find my ideas in the Protocols and found a one page summary at Rense and wrote:

Is this an inaccurate summary? Because in reading the Protocols I am having trouble finding something that directly relates to what I wrote. No metaphysical struggle, no rights of man and no concept that TPTB are tricking the masses into believing they have entitlement.

Your response:

“Appoint puppet leaders who can be controlled by blackmail is the closest thing to it and that I should read your book at Amazon, “Illuminati” and re-read the Protocols online. They are only 50 pages. But the first 5 are enough. It goes on about liberalism and equality being bait.”

I replied:

I don’t think bait accurately describes my premise when I say it lead to the middle class and consumerism.

And you wrote:

“How can you write on this topic and admit not having read the Protocols of the Elders of Zion?”

My last response to date:

Simple, I started with a premise that our environmental damage was the goal and then went on to prove it. I could only use the protocols to support my theory never to prove it.

Henry, my request is simple, is my perspective on history unique?

I am willing to pay you (or anyone with your credibility) to discredit my theory.

This may interest you.

The Planetary Archetypal Situation on 9/11/2001