back

Recent TPAs

January 21, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

‘Yes’ if Texas could Secede
By Robert Singer

More than 130 years of government propaganda hid the fact that our beloved President Abraham Lincoln slaughtered 620,000 Americans and destroyed the principle that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed.

In 1860 Southerners no longer consented to being governed by Washington, D.C. but Lincoln put an end to that idea by fomenting the civil war when he threatened the South, “It is my duty to collect all the duties and revenues and tariffs and save so that there will be no invasion.”

Abraham Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation was little more than a political gimmick, and he admitted so in a letter to Treasury Secretary Salmon P. Chase: “The original proclamation has no—legal justification, except as a military measure.”

Secession and a 47% Tariff
The right to secession was popularly held and newspaper after Northern newspaper printed editorials arguing the right of the south to secede (secession) until Lincoln ordered the Postmaster General to cease mail delivery of those papers.

The South was forced into a secession posture with the Whig and the Republican Party agenda. “The tariff was the keystone of the Republican Party platform of 1860,” and the so-called “internal improvements a euphemism for welfare dished out to Northern corporations.

Almost every historian writing about the Civil War ignores the obvious.

The tariff was the main source of federal revenue, and since the South was dependent on imports – they were paying about 80 percent or more of all federal tariff revenue. For decades they complained that most of the money was being spent in the North, and that’s when the rate was 15 percent.

When Lincoln came into office he secured that the Civil War was imminent when he tripled the rate to 47 percent.

Our most beloved president, a mythical humanitarian, forced the South to secede then intentionally waged a cruel and bloody war on civilians as well as soldiers.

In his memoirs General William Tecumseh Sherman wrote that when he met with the “gentle” Lincoln after his March to the Sea, Lincoln laughed almost uncontrollably when Sherman told stories of how thousands of Southern civilians, mostly women, children, and old men, were plundered, sometimes murdered, and rendered homeless.

Crushing states rights was critical to us becoming a consumer society. The United States in its first decades was a land of small farms and nearby towns with few cities of any consequence, and the young nation seemed far more interested in becoming a successful experiment in democracy rather than an economic power.



January 20, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

Alex Jones and Patricia Doyle, PHD
By Robert Singer

You can get a feel for which websites are disinformation based on their coverage of Patricia Doyle, PhD and her article – Do Not Take A Swine Flu Vaccine! Article.

The dead microbiologists working on DNA Sequencing (see my article: “Washington and Poland just moved the World closer to War – Unlikely” posted at Rumormillnews is related to this issue.)

Very few alternative news websites published “Do Not Take A Swine Flu Vaccine!”

As of May 3, 2009 the following sites who claim to be bold, daring and publish the news the mainstream media doesn’t want you to know did not have her article. [Note these are sites with an editorial staff that approves the content]

Opednews, Counterpunch, Commondreams, Alternet, Worldnetdaily and in particular ALEX JONES AND DAVID ICKE did not have the article as of May of 2009.

Read the rest at Unfiltered History



January 19, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

Playmate Of The Year In 1976 Cures OCWD
By Robert Singer

I attended the April, 2010 Green Film Festival Banquet and sat next to Lillian Muller:

Actress, Author, Supermodel, Inspirational Speaker for us “Plant-Based Diet Sapiens”, Playmate and Hugh Hefner’s old girlfriend. (Ominous Drilling Sign for the Truth that pulled out all the stops and told the complete metaphysical struggle of the Illuminati and Mother-Earth.

Googling the title in April of 2010 returned 20 pages of results and quotes from the article can be found at the NPR Topics Page and link to The Market Oracle version, U.S. Addicted to Oil, An Ominous Drilling Sign for the Truth, can be found on the John D. Rockefeller Story Page at USATODAY.com

Read the rest at Unfiltered History



January 18, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

Adolph Hitler: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened, Part 3
By Robert Singer

Here is a quote from Part 3 of my Modern State of Israel series: Adolph Hitler: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened:

What is more unusual: on March 24 1933 the Zionists without consulting Jews in Germany or for that matter Jews anywhere in the world, “Declare War On Germany” on the front page of the London Daily Express. We know they did not consult German Jews because since the Emancipation Edict of 1822, Jews were guaranteed all civil rights enjoyed by Germans. You can guess which country offered Jews a refuge from Russia when the Communist coup failed in 1905… Germany.

When I wrote the article I did not footnote, the last line: You can guess which country offered Jews a refuge from Russia when the Communist coup failed in 1905… Germany.

It is a quote from Andrew Hitchcock’s The History of the House of Rothschild.

My research concluded there was a problem with the common explanation that the Germans have always been anti-Semites.
History tells another story: Jews experienced a period of legal equality from 1848 until the rise of Nazi Germany. German Jews enjoyed full equality in the Weimar Republic, many receiving high political positions like foreign minister and vice chancellor.

The Weimar constitution was the work of a German Jew, Hugo Preuss, who later became minister of the interior. Marriages between Jews and non-Jews became somewhat common from the 19th century; for example, the wife of German Chancellor Gustav Stresemann was Jewish. By the end of the 1920s, most German Jews were fully integrated into German society, living as German citizens with German interests. They served in the German army and contributed to every field of German science, business and culture. [the Institute for Jewish Affairs of New York, and Christopher Sykes in "Crossroads to Israel", London 1965, and by Nathan Weinstock, "Le sionisme contre Israel,"]

However, when I went looking for a citation for Germany offering a refuge for Jews, other than Andrew Hitchcock or Benjamin Friedman, it was almost impossible to find.

Impossible for Rumormillnews agents and Common Ground Posters as well. No one claimed an autographed copy of Rayelan’s books.

Solution Citation:

1882 -1913: 1.5 million Jews left Russia. Total: 2 million Jews left Eastern Europe and Russia between 1880 and 1914. Many the Jews went through Germany (1.2 million) and some stayed there (78.000). Beyond the Pale, A history of the Jews in Russia and Eastern Europe from the Middle Ages to the present.

HILFSVEREIN DER DEUTSCHEN JUDEN (“Relief Organization of German Jews”), German Jewish organization founded in 1901 to improve the social and political conditions of the Jews in eastern Europe and the Orient.

After the Kishinev pogrom, the Hilfsverein called the Vienna Conference of 1903 to organize relief of Russian Jewry, and a similar conference in London in 1905. During the 1905 revolution in Russia it gave financial help to the self-defense groups of the [[Social-Democrat]] Bund and [[racist]] Zionists. Encyclopaedia Judaica (1971): [[anti-Zionist]] Hilfsverein [[Relief Organization]], vol. 8, col. 480:

Read the rest at Dprogram.net



January 17, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

“2023″ Comments from Rumormillnews (150 words)
By Robert Singer

I just received a phone call from Knowthelies.com. Several Rumormillnews readers commented on my article “Is Jesus Christ Coming Back to Earth in MMXXIII (2023)?”

Perhaps I should change the title to

Could Jesus Christ be coming back to earth in MM (2000) XX (20) III (3) MMXXIII or 2023?

and move the last paragraph of the article to the introduction so readers will know where to direct their comments about the “confusing” roman numeral MMXXIII.

Send them to Paracelsus.

The prophet Daniel, the book of revelation and Paracelsus in the Twenty Ninth figure of his prognostications confirms 2023.

How blessed shall be the hour, and the poverty, that will come and shall ordain each one to its meadow, not far from the year XXXXIII.†

Most of the prognostications of Paracelsus concern countries, institutions, establishments and monarchies. Figure 29 seems to refer to the individual and in particular to a state of change that each individual can reach.

The date given at the end is confusing since there is no such Roman numeral. Forty-three in Roman numerals would be XLIII. The fact that Paracelsus tells us this is a year is the clue to the correct interpretation of the figure.

Could Jesus Christ be coming back to earth in MM (2000) XX (20) III (3) MMXXIII or 2023?

NOTE: Research for this article came from an out of print book by Ian Gurney, the Cassandra Prophesy published in 1999.

Is Jesus Christ Coming Back to Earth in MMXXIII (2023)? at Knowthelies.com



January 16, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

9/11, What’s Wrong With This Picture?
By Robert Singer

KnowTheLies has reviewed the content herein and agrees the author, Robert Singer, has presented a new and different perspective on the events of 9/11.

And finally a warning from President Bush, “Let us never tolerate
outrageous conspiracy theories” aired on national television after the attacks of 9/11 and right before the Patriot Act was forced down Congress.

Super misinformation.

Google “9/11 conspiracy” and you get 134,000,000 results.
Google “9/11 outrageous conspiracy” you get 556,000 results.
There is a 9/11-truth movement in every major city in the United States.

9/11 conspiracy theories are allowed and even encouraged. Could the 9/11 Truth movement be the cover for another story?

read the entire article below

9/11, What’s Wrong With This Picture?



January 15, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

In the Spring 1955 retailing analyst Victor Lebow articulated the solution that has become the norm for the our consumer economy:

“Our enormously productive economy. . . demands that we make consumption our way of life, that we convert the buying and use of goods into rituals, that we seek our spiritual satisfaction, our ego satisfaction, in consumption . . . we need things consumed, burned up, replaced and discarded at an ever-accelerating rate.”

Kennedy and the Martin Luther King assassinations

Conspiracy theories abound concerning the assassinations of president John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King. As mentioned above, the CIA is mentioned as possibly being involved in all three. We do know the CIA lied about aspects of the JFK assassination. Lies are usually told to hide the truth; what truth was the CIA covering up for 40 years, and why? Why did the CIA withhold evidence from the Warren Commission and defy court orders?

April 27, 1961 John Fitzgerald “Jack” Kennedy (JFK) gives the speech that got him Killed

June 4, 1963 Executive Order 11110 was issued by U.S. President John F. Kennedy
November 22, 1963 – The JFK Assassination
April 4, 1968 – Martin Luther King, Jr. Assassination
June 5, 1968 – The Robert F. Kennedy assassination
December 8, 1980 John Lennon Assassination
January 20, 1981 Ronald Reagan takes office as the 40th POTUS

February 5, 1981 (Two weeks after taking office) Reagan addressed the nation on the economy as such:

“By 1960 our national debt stood at $284 billion. Today the debt is $934 billion. We can leave our children with an un-repayable massive debt and a shattered economy, or we can leave them liberty in a land where every individual has the opportunity to be whatever God intended us to be. Together we can forge a new beginning for America.” In the same speech, Reagan displays his innocence of Federal Reserve politics, “Now, in all of this we will, of course, work closely with the Federal Reserve System toward the objective of a stable monetary policy.” On March 26, 1981 Reagan signs Executive Order 12301 establishing the Presidential Council on Integrity & Efficiency to review federal programs for inefficiencies and corruption. Predictably, four days later, the Federal Reserve and H.W. Bush “works with” John Hinckley Jr. to instruct Reagan on the first lesson of Federal Reserve politics. A president can be more popular than the vice president, but not always more powerful. Although the Bush and Hinckley family had long, close ties overlooked by the press— the brother of the man who tried to kill the president was acquainted with the son of the man who would have become president if the attack had been successful—the family connection between Scott Hinckley and Neil Bush did not escape Alexander Haig, who, after the Reagan assassination attempt, temporarily prevented Vice President Bush from taking control of the White House. Reagan learned the lesson: he was a figurehead relegated to witnessing the growth of America’s hyper-consumer society and national debt from the sidelines.

March 30, 1981 – The attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan “Bones” in the Money Pit



January 14, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

The Federal Reserve: Stupid Bank Robbers or Robber “Hood” Barons: A Psychohistory Analysis
By Katherine Smith, PhD

“The Federal Reserve isn’t evil because they print our money and make us (the U.S. Taxpayers) pay interest on it. They are evil because, until October 2008, the Fed gave us a no-limit credit card that we used to buy houses, cars, RVs, TVs and DVDs—the “stuff” which, according to the GEO4, a massive United Nations Report, put the planet at the unknown points of no return.”

Read the rest at The Peoples Voice



January 13, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

“In transition” (another good sign)
By Robert Singer

Original post date is Sept. 6, 2009.

Is the new documentary about the Transition Movement.

It will debut in cities worldwide on Weds Sept 9, and there will be a screening in Los Angeles!

“In Transition” explains the Transition process — the problems we face as a society, and what local grassroots groups are doing about them. The film includes footage filmed by many Transition initiatives worldwide.

In the film you will see the stories of communities creating their own currencies, setting up their own local businesses, planting trees, growing food. You’ll see local government officials getting behind their local Transition initiatives, and get a sense of the scale of this emerging movement. It is a story of hope, and it is a call to action.

You can view the trailer at http://transitionculture.org/in-transition/

Los Angeles screening 7pm, Weds Sept 9
Suggested donation $5, but no one will be turned away for lack of funds. Please also bring a can of food to donate to LAX Food Pantry.
Site: Community Hall of Holy Nativity, 6700 W. 83rd, Westchester (LA 90045)
Hosted by Transition Los Angeles www.TransitionLA.org

Bring your friends for this special event. If they’ve never heard of the Transition movement, this is the perfect introduction. We’ll have core team members of Transition Los Angeles on hand for discussion following the movie.

You should check out the Transition Culture Home Page.



January 12, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

“Why [we should] Not Attack Iran?”

Want to find real community in the United States?
By Katherine Smith

David Swanson, author of When the World Outlawed War, and War Is A Lie just released an excellent article on Why [we should] Not Attack Iran.

Attacking Iran, a country with a non-existent nuclear weapons capability and an air force that belongs in a museum, is back in the news. [1]

Read Want to find real community in the United States, published  September 28, 2010, the last time the U.S. government wanted to start World War III with Iran. 

[1] Who’s Telling the Truth About Iran’s Nuclear Program? by Muhammad Sahimi

Since February 2003, Iran’s nuclear program has undergone what the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) itself admits to be the most intrusive inspection in its entire history. After thousands of hours of inspections by some of the most experienced IAEA experts, the Agency has verified time and again that (1) there is no evidence of a nuclear weapons program in Iran, and (2) all the declared nuclear materials have been accounted for; there has been no diversion of such materials to non-peaceful purposes. Iran has a clean bill of health, as far as its nuclear program is concerned.

July 7, 2008 04:24 AM H. Con. Res. 362 – through efforts, Iran seeks to establish regional hegemony, threatens longstanding friends of the United States in the Middle East, and endangers American national security interests.

Regional hegemony is not achieved with Iranian army that has been designed solely to defend Iran, and an air force that belongs in museums.

To summarize: it is clear that practically every paragraph in the Senate and House Resolutions have factual errors, lies, exaggerations, and half-truths. Iran can be criticized on many grounds, particularly in the area of respect for human rights. But, Iran is not a threat to the United States or to Israel. It is not anywhere close to having the capability for manufacturing nuclear weapons, even if it wanted to.

Therefore, the American public must recognize these Resolutions for what they really are: War Resolutions proposed and pushed by neoconservatives in both the Democrat and Republican parties, various pro-Israel lobbies, and their allies.

It is crucial that the American public act now, today, by calling their congressional representatives before these “declarations of war” against Iran are passed. If we do launch an unprovoked attack on Iran the results will most probably be horrific to all sides, if not to the entire world.



January 11, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

“Why [we should] Not Attack Iran?”

Preparing for World War III in 1925
By Katherine Smith

David Swanson, author of When the World Outlawed War, and War Is A Lie just released an excellent article on Why [we should] Not Attack Iran.

Attacking Iran, a country with a non-existent nuclear weapons capability and an air force that belongs in a museum, is back in the news. [1]

Read Preparing for World War III in 1925, published  September 28, 2010, the last time the U.S. government wanted to start World War III with Iran.

[1] Who’s Telling the Truth About Iran’s Nuclear Program? by Muhammad Sahimi

Since February 2003, Iran’s nuclear program has undergone what the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) itself admits to be the most intrusive inspection in its entire history. After thousands of hours of inspections by some of the most experienced IAEA experts, the Agency has verified time and again that (1) there is no evidence of a nuclear weapons program in Iran, and (2) all the declared nuclear materials have been accounted for; there has been no diversion of such materials to non-peaceful purposes. Iran has a clean bill of health, as far as its nuclear program is concerned.

July 7, 2008 04:24 AM H. Con. Res. 362 – through efforts, Iran seeks to establish regional hegemony, threatens longstanding friends of the United States in the Middle East, and endangers American national security interests.

Regional hegemony is not achieved with Iranian army that has been designed solely to defend Iran, and an air force that belongs in museums.

To summarize: it is clear that practically every paragraph in the Senate and House Resolutions have factual errors, lies, exaggerations, and half-truths. Iran can be criticized on many grounds, particularly in the area of respect for human rights. But, Iran is not a threat to the United States or to Israel. It is not anywhere close to having the capability for manufacturing nuclear weapons, even if it wanted to.

Therefore, the American public must recognize these Resolutions for what they really are: War Resolutions proposed and pushed by neoconservatives in both the Democrat and Republican parties, various pro-Israel lobbies, and their allies.

It is crucial that the American public act now, today, by calling their congressional representatives before these “declarations of war” against Iran are passed. If we do launch an unprovoked attack on Iran the results will most probably be horrific to all sides, if not to the entire world.



January 9, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

“Why [we should] Not Attack Iran?”

Waxman, Waters and Iran, Connect the Dots
By Katherine Smith

  • July 25 – WikiLeaks of tens of thousands of Army documents related to the war in Afghanistan
  • Jul 28 – An out of character vote, by Henry Waxman, an apologist for Bush’s wars against the 2010 emergency funding for the Afghanistan
  • Aug 2 – the House Ethics Committee formally brought a case against Congresswoman Maxine Waters, one of America’s most enduring liberal and fierce Anti War politicians

Speculation by bloggers, including John Young of Cryptome.com, and an expose at The Intel Hub, of WikiLeaks being part of a disinformation operation and that the documents themselves could even be fake. This should put every left leaning American on Yellow Alert.

Fox News wasted no time exploiting the WikiLeaks documents to further vilify Iran, pointing out that the documents indicate the U.S. belief that Iran is arming the Taliban insurgency. This adds another layer to Fox’s steady stream of propaganda that has flowed over the years, advocating for an attack on the country and stands as a reason why some believe the leak was staged. WikiLeaks documents– disinformation or not– are being used for anti-Iran propaganda, OpEdNews

An investigation marginalizing the most virulent anti-war Democrat in Congress,

at a time when the U.S. is openly considering a raid on Iranian’s (non-existent) nuclear weapons program, could be the most dangerous move towards nuclear war the world has seen since the 1962 Cuba Missile crisis.

Congresswoman Waters responded immediately to the baseless charges and asked the committee for an immediate adjudicatory hearing.

“The record will show that in advocating on behalf of minority banks, neither my office nor I benefited in any way, engaged in improper action or influenced anyone.”

The committee, which apparently is dragging its feet on the investigation of the alleged impropriety that took place 18 months ago, recently announced it could not determine a date for the hearing.

On August 4, 2010, Congresswoman Waters waived her right to confidentiality and directed the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to release to the public all documents related to the investigation.

The failure to release the allegations against Congresswoman Waters has resulted in a media circus of speculation based only on a report prepared by the controversial Office of Congressional Ethics.

Read the rest at Daily.PK



January 8, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

“Why [we should] Not Attack Iran?”

The Power of Community
By Katherine Smith

In September 2006, the world experienced a paradigm shift when a strong lobbying effort by grassroots organizations effectively derailed an initiative: A move that was tantamount to a declaration of war on Iran.

U.S.: Iran Resolution Shelved in Rare Defeat for Israel Lobby

In a significant and highly unusual defeat for the powerful American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) the Democratic leadership of the House of Representatives has decided to shelve a long-pending, albeit non-binding, resolution that called for President George W. Bush to launch what critics called a blockade against Iran.

But an unexpectedly strong lobbying effort by a number of grassroots Iranian-American, Jewish-American, peace, and church groups effectively derailed the initiative.

The decision by the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Howard Berman, to shelve HR 362 marked an unusual defeat for AIPAC, according to its critics who charged that the resolution was designed to lay the groundwork for the Bush administration or any successor administration to take military action against Iran.

A nuclear confrontation with Iran was avoided in 2006 because a small number of people with the power of community were enough to convince our Government not to take the world to the point of no return.

Our un-elected officials got the message, that the perils of a nuclear confrontation with Iran could mean the end of life for everyone here on earth. Congress refused to go along with the Bush Administration’s plans for military action against Iran.

Just two years later, the power of community stopped congress from attacking Iran.

Read the rest at Hidden Mysteries



January 7, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

Why [we should] Not Attack Iran?

David Swanson, author of When the World Outlawed War, and War Is A Lie just release an excellent article on Why [we should] Not Attack Iran.

Attacking Iran, a country with a non-existent nuclear weapons capability and an air force that belongs in a museum, is back in the news. [1]

Read The Maxine Waters Investigation: What is Iran Doing in this Picture?, published August 7, 2010, the last time the U.S. government wanted to start World War III with Iran.

[1] Who’s Telling the Truth About Iran’s Nuclear Program? by Muhammad Sahimi

Since February 2003, Iran’s nuclear program has undergone what the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) itself admits to be the most intrusive inspection in its entire history. After thousands of hours of inspections by some of the most experienced IAEA experts, the Agency has verified time and again that (1) there is no evidence of a nuclear weapons program in Iran, and (2) all the declared nuclear materials have been accounted for; there has been no diversion of such materials to non-peaceful purposes. Iran has a clean bill of health, as far as its nuclear program is concerned.

July 7, 2008 04:24 AM H. Con. Res. 362 – through efforts, Iran seeks to establish regional hegemony, threatens longstanding friends of the United States in the Middle East, and endangers American national security interests.

Regional hegemony is not achieved with Iranian army that has been designed solely to defend Iran, and an air force that belongs in museums.

To summarize: it is clear that practically every paragraph in the Senate and House Resolutions have factual errors, lies, exaggerations, and half-truths. Iran can be criticized on many grounds, particularly in the area of respect for human rights. But, Iran is not a threat to the United States or to Israel. It is not anywhere close to having the capability for manufacturing nuclear weapons, even if it wanted to.

Therefore, the American public must recognize these Resolutions for what they really are: War Resolutions proposed and pushed by neoconservatives in both the Democrat and Republican parties, various pro-Israel lobbies, and their allies.

It is crucial that the American public act now, today, by calling their congressional representatives before these “declarations of war” against Iran are passed. If we do launch an unprovoked attack on Iran the results will most probably be horrific to all sides, if not to the entire world.



January 5, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

2008 Financial Collapse: An Inside Job
By Robert Singer

Maybe it’s the smoke from Mt. Vesuvius that keeps Arianna Huffington and the financial community from seeing that the economic collapse has nothing to do with the Fed “missing” the warning signs leading up to the October meltdown.

“Things do not happen. Things are made to happen.” John F. Kennedy

The Fed didn’t miss anything; the October meltdown was an inside job.

Read the rest at Dprogram.net



January 4, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

The Modern State of Israel: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened, Part 1
By Robert Singer

Read 4 articles about Israel and the House of Rothschild before it’s too late. Internet2 is coming and will be heavily policed and regulated.

Numerous sites refuse to publish these articles because they are deemed of a “dangerous and controversial nature”.

If the link is broken or the site is under a attack try whatreallyhappened.com knowthelies.com waronyou.com fourwinds10.com daily.pk therearenosunglasses and pakalert.wordpress.com, dprogram.net

Author Robert Singer has submitted a very interesting and thought provoking 4 part article on the Modern State of Israel…

* The Modern State of Israel: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened (Part 1)
also titled
Preparing for World War III: August 15, 1871 (Part 1)

* World War I, II: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened (Part 2)

* Adolph Hitler: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened (Part 3)

* How did Hitler lose the war: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened (Part 4)

Please see the Modern State of Israel Articles at Dprogram.net



January 3, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

David Ray Griffin Uses 9/11 to Call for a New World Order
By Robert Singer

Last year I attended a 9/11 Truth event where David Ray Griffin was speaking. I handed this out to the attendees.

David Ray Griffin Uses 9/11 to Call for a New World Order
December 30, 2006, (David Ray Griffin writes to angieon911):

“At the same time as the case is being made for the necessity and possibility of global government, people in various religious and philosophical traditions need to be interpreting those traditions, probably through a combination of retrieval and reformation, so as to reveal and emphasize their support for this transition to world unity … My major project at present is, in fact, to develop a theology for a new world order …

[Angieon911.com responds]

I saw no need to contact you (Griffin) about your views on a one world government because I did check them out myself before I wrote my piece. I xeroxed from a reference library, for example, an on-point book entitled “Toward Genuine Global Governance” in which you have a chapter entitled ‘Global Government: Objections Considered’.

You and all of your previously mentioned friend/writing/project partners (with whom you noted in your recent 911 video presentation you must share generally everything with, beliefs, etc., in common) spread the underlying odious and specious premise created always initially by those in control of the world’s resources, which I do find even worse than creepy (what

I referred to in my prior piece so eloquently as “Malthusian crap”) – that even were the resources of the world to be distributed equitably among the masses of humanity, there are soon to be insufficient resources in the world for everybody. With this premise, we are, as Brian Salter wrote “being pre-programmed to lie down and fail to resist genocidal depopulation and precipitous global “downsizing” by fatalistically absorbing the idea that the earth can’t support the current population anyway.”

This Club of Rome-like Malthusian crap is more recently pushed by things like the ROCKEFELLER, et al., supported Earth Charter Initiative. (Links regarding same are included in a postscript following this reply).

For example, to further the work that you and John Cobb created with the “Center for Process Studies” which you both founded and co-direct, you both conceived and organized (see this issue of your Center’s newsletter “Declaration in Support of the Earth Charter Initiative” which described the problem or “the cause of great suffering” to be the:

“unprecedented rise in human population and scales of human consumption overburdening ecological and social systems. Seriously unsustainable demands are being placed on our social and ecological systems” The declaration went on to state that:

“Through a long participatory process, a new Earth Charter has been proposed for promoting change for a sustainable future. We give our most sincere and profound support for this new Earth Charter. We endorse its principles and pledge ourselves to teaching them and living our lies consistently with them.”

That’s quite a revealing typographical error, by the way. I assume the intended language above was living our “lives” consistently with them, rather than living our “lies”, but back to the text of your newly founded Network’s declaration in support of the Earth Charter Initiative:

“In addition, we commit ourselves to a philosophical critique of the values and understandings that have led to our present situation. We pledge ourselves to the development of an integrative understanding of the world that undergirds and supports just and sustainable human communities in an ecologically responsible context. We are committed to affirming and developing supportive philosophies and actions for the realization of the goals of the Earth Charter.”

Further, organizations joining the Network were advised by your co-director John Cobb that the Earth Charter provides guidance for the activities of everyone’s work:

There’s documentation out there that the Rockefellers have played a role in re-engineering religion, so my mention of your Rockefeller ties was not gratuitous. As you yourself mention, all applications to the Bellagio-Rockefeller are directly reviewed by the Rockefeller Foundation, and approved based on their content, so your organization’s conference was not merely funded by them.

And it is interesting to learn from your reply that it was actually during your five-week Bellagio-Rockefeller Study Center stay in the early 90’s that you first developed your conviction that a new global structure is a necessity.

Of course you are free, David, to weave your conspiracy theories about me, that I am, for example, covertly working for those who want to keep the US government in control of the planet, but you might have a much harder time of it. We don’t travel in the same circles, you see. In fact, you travel in the very circles of the academic handmaidens of the murderously genocidal global elite.

But, hey, maybe some people will believe that your frequent project partner, Richard Falk, is a member of the CFR so as to “positively influence” it, as you suggest. I’ve heard people joined, and remained, members of the Ku Klux Klan for similar reasons :-) . Lots of luck to him. And in that “huge fight” you say he had with David Rockefeller, did anyone need medical assistance?



January 2, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

The Future of Silver- No Silver Lining
By Robert Singer

Interview references my article Silver, But No Silver Lining.

The end of our consumer society is on the horizon, which should be no surprise to anyone who took Economics 101. Do we really expect to spend our way out of this mess by buying and selling each other useless cheap stuff from China ?

Read the rest at The Market Oracle



January 1, 2012 | Click here to view Thought Provoking Article Index

History, HACCP and the Food Safety Con Job
By Nicole Johnson

Vested interest groups have orchestrated a legislative lullaby to hush the public’s growing unease with the safety of its food supply. Their enablers in the mainstream corporate controlled media amplify a chorus of government officials and non-governmental organizations admonishing that the public must be confident that the food it buys is safe. But having confidence our food is safe is not the same as having food that is safe and wholesome to eat.

The American public has a great and unmet need to understand the true impacts (that is, the predictable consequences) of the Food Safety Enhancement Act of 2009, before the Senates passes its version of this dangerous bill. The US Congress has a long, tragic history of passing legislation that promotes the industrialization of our food supply, effectively implementing the wishes — both stated and unstated — of agribusiness, and it’s about to do it again.

Read the rest at OpEdNews