Robert Singer’s Speaking Engagement at The Institute for Historical Review **Cancelled**

By Robert Singer

The following is a summary of a May 20, 2010 telephone conversation between Robert Singer and Mark Weber, the director of The Institute for Historical Review (IHR).

Mark is a historian, lecturer, current affairs analyst and author. He holds a Master’s degree in modern European History from Indiana University.

The Institute for Historical Review (IHR) continues the tradition of historical revisionism pioneered by distinguished historians such as Harry Elmer Barnes, A.J.P. Taylor, Charles Tansill, Paul Rassinier and William H. Chamberlin. It strives, in the words of Barnes, to “bring history into accord with the facts.” [1]

I contacted Mark and offered to be a speaker at the next conference.

Initially, Mark said they didn’t have speakers at the Institute; however, later he admitted that he had misspoken. As of today, I have not been scheduled to really bring History in accord with the connection (facts) of two World Wars and the Holocaust to the Modern State of Israel. [2]

The “delay” in scheduling my speaking engagement may be related to, according to Weber, the fact that I (Robert Singer) made the connection to The Modern State of Israel Series (The Series) that everyone in history including Barnes, Taylor, Rassinier, Chamberlin and of course Mark Weber had missed.

After all the years of research and hard work at IHR attempting to “bring history into accord with the facts,” and their efforts attempting to end the reign of “Jewish-Zionist power”, it was naïve to think that IHR was going to let Robert Singer, an almost unknown author, with no advanced degree, no book publishing credits, come to IHR and embarrass Barnes, Taylor, Rassinier, Chamberlin and of course, Mark Weber, with six articles that took him less than one year to research, write and publish.

Historians, scholars and researchers have spent half of the 20th Century writing hundreds of thousands of manuscripts, books, theses, dissertations, essays and journal submissions which attempt to resolve the anomalies and inconsistencies of the events from 1897-1948. My six-part series on the Modern State of Israel is less than 10,000 words and resolves every anomaly and inconsistency relating to two world wars and the Holocaust. Everything makes sense when you come to grips with the fact that 70 million people died in order for the Jews to settle in Palestine in 1948. [3]

Events That Changed the World in the Twentieth Century, edited by Frank W. Thackeray and John E. Findling is a unique resource that offers detailed descriptions and expert analysis of the 20th Century’s most important events; however, the creation of the State of Israel is not among the Events That Changed the World in the Twentieth Century. [4]

If the creation of the modern State of Israel is considered one of the most important events in the 20th Century, then the following insights bring history into accord with the facts:

Mark, who initially claimed he had not read The Series, later admitted: “I may have simply meant that I did not specifically recall your writings, or connected them with you. I’d be glad to talk again. I certainly don’t want to be in a state of denial.” [2]

Mark conducted a telephone review over the telephone that centered around a number of critiques that Mark acknowledged might be nitpicking, but he wanted to make sure my “outrageous statements had especially rigorous proof.”

The Series was published in March of 2009, and to date only three items have surfaced that needed clarification:

1)      The Introduction to Part 1 had the wrong secret society for Albert Pike. “In 1871, Albert Pike, founder of one of the Rothschild secret societies, Order of Perfectibilists,” should have read, “In 1871, Albert Pike, Grand Master of the Luciferian group known as the Order of the Palladium.” 2)      Part 2 of The Series: “the first time Germany won and offered the losers a simple status quo and end of the war, with no punitive conditions” required Appendix 3.5 [At the end of this article] 3)      Part 3: of The Series: “You can guess which country offered Jews a refuge from Russia when the Communist coup failed in 1905… Germany.” required Appendix 2.5 [At the end of this article]

Mark’s critique of Part 1, The Modern State of Israel: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened began with the very first sentence:

The following Glossary, abbreviations and essay will help the reader understand how Theodor Herzl on August 29, 1897 predicted that within fifty years there would be a Jewish state.

Mark thought Theodor Herzl’s famous quote, “there would be a Jewish State within fifty years” wasn’t prophetic because Herzl made a lot of predictions that didn’t come true (I can only find one: his prophecy of an end to anti-semitism went unfulfilled).

To his credit, Mark didn’t try the “Herzl was off by one year,” because he knew UN Resolution (GA 181) partitioned Palestine in 1947.

We spent a lot of time on the next two sentences:

Zionism: an organization of Jews who believed the Jewish people needed a nation of their own to escape persecution.

Judaism: Jews collectively who practice a religion based on the Torah and the Talmud.

Mark’s point was that “Zionism” should have read the “Zionist movement” and wanted me to resolve the age-old question: Is Judaism a religion or a race?

The term “Zionism” was used to deflect any accusation that my essays were anti-semitic. Mark has extensive experience trying to avoid a charge that he is an anti-semitic Holocaust denier. [5]

The Rothschilds are not the Jews of the Bible and do not practice Judaism

Mark got me to admit that Mayer Amschel Rothschild probably attended a synagogue in his lifetime and that I am both a Khazar and Jew. Mark is familiar with Dave Chagall’s God’s Other: Chosen the Troubled Journey of the Khazars? and The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler.

He then blindsided with me an attack on the reference to Mel Gibson:

Mel Gibson would have been correct if he had claimed the Rothschilds are responsible for all the wars in the world.

Mark thought the sentence should read:

Mel Gibson would have been correct if he had claimed the Rothschilds are responsible for all the wars in the world, but this essay will only claim they are responsible for World Wars I and II.

Mark was on thin ice when he called the “Labour Leader” irresponsible for printing:

“This blood-sucking crew (The Rothschilds) has been the cause of untold mischief and misery in Europe during the present century, and has piled up its prodigious wealth chiefly through fomenting wars between States which ought never to have quarreled.”

At this point I figured out Mark’s “tell.”

As soon as I brought up anything that Mark could not refute, dispute or discredit, i.e.:

Mary Peck, The Balfour Declaration, Beer Hall Putsch, The Munich Agreement, Hitler, an unemployed high school drop out and the illegitimate son of a Rothschild, Gavrilo Princip, the 19-year-old assassin and member of the Black Hand secret society, Black Hand society, Herschel Grynszpan, The Munich agreement and Lenni Brenner’s 51 Documents: Zionism Collaboration with the Nazis.

He would simply respond, “Yes I have read or heard that” and then go back to his three fruit-loop arguments.

(1) The impact of the Scofield Bible, (2) Hitler’s war record in World War I and (3) How could Rothschild be sure Germany would win World War I the first time which resulted in the Balfour Declaration.

Mark prefers Number 3, “How could the Rothschilds know that fomenting World War I would lead to the Balfour declaration.”

Although the Rothschilds don’t talk to me, history supports my prima facie case:

Samuel Untermeyer, prominent New York City attorney, did blackmail Wilson to get Louis Dembitz Brandeis, the most politically influential of all Zionists in the United States appointed to the Supreme Court. Brandeis volunteered his opinion that the sinking of the S.S. Sussex by a German submarine in the English Channel justified the declaration of war against Germany. [Part 2: World War I, II: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened]

So, either the events above are four infinitely impossible “chance occurrences,” like the same four people winning the lottery 24 weeks in a row, or I am correct that The Global Financial Elite (TGFE, a variation of TPTB, a non-conspiracy acronym for the House of Rothschild), behind every social cataclysm in modern history [6]) had a satanic purpose for getting the Jews to Haifa, not in 1946, not in 1950, but in 1948, Aka The Key to the Secret of the Universe. [7]

Adolph Hitler

The Fuehrer’s name came up several times in the conversation. I claimed he was a buffoon who tried to avoid the war with the Munich Agreement and, when that didn’t work, he went out of his way to lose World War II by invading Russia in the winter and letting 335,000 Allied soldiers escape at Dunkirk.

Mark’s narrative: “Hitler was admired by someone in the British Parliament and everyone knows that he was a brave soldier in World War I.”

My response: “Hitler displayed symptoms of mind control (MK-Ultra) when he rants, raves and sweats during his famous speeches” and then I brought up America’s most famous recluse, J.D. Salinger.

Considering Mark’s depth of knowledge, it wasn’t surprising that he knew about Salinger’s role in World War II. Salinger’s time was spent mainly in the interrogation of captured Nazis, however, toward the end of the war, he was involved in the denazification of Germany and the creation of the mind control program, MK-Ultra and Project Artichoke.

Mark wasn’t interested in my theory that A Perfect Day for Bananafish was a story about Salinger’s personal struggle with suicide, because alleging a conspiracy about the story behind the story of two World Wars and the Holocaust in 1950 would be hazardous to Salinger’s mental and physical health.

I claim he was tormented by:

The knowledge he learned as a counter intelligence officer during World War II; that millions of deaths and untold amounts of suffering caused by two World Wars and the Holocaust had nothing to do with an incompetent fanatical dictator, financed by Prescott Bush. [J. D. Salinger – With Love and Squalor, For Esmé] get the later one!!!

But Mark wanted me to reconcile, Toland’s assessment: “Hitler fought bravely in the war and was promoted to corporal and decorated with both the Iron Cross Second Class and First Class.” [8]

[Excerpt From Memorial Day 2010: Adolph Hitler and Pvt. Henry Tandey]

September 28, 1918, the French village of Marcoing

The annals of history are full of fateful moments which scholars refer to as the great “what if’s” of history, where if events had taken only a slight deviation the course of human affairs would have been dramatically different. Such a moment occurred in the last moments of the Great War in the French village of Marcoing involving 27 year old Private Henry Tandey of Warwickshire, UK.

Tandey was mentioned five times in dispatches and certainly earned his VC during the capture of the French village and crossing at Marcoing, his regiment held down by heavy machine gun fire Tandey crawled forward, located the machine gun nest and took it out.

Arriving at the crossing Henry Tandey braved heavy fire to place wooden planks over a gaping hole enabling troops to roll across and take the battle to the Germans.

As the ferocious battle wound down and enemy troops surrendered or retreated a wounded German soldier limped out of the maelstrom and into Private Tandey’s line of fire, the battle weary man never raised his rifle and just stared at Tandey resigned to the inevitable.

“I took aim but couldn’t shoot a wounded man (Hitler),” said Tandey, “so I let him go.”

Henry Tandey VC DCM MM was haunted the remainder of his life by his good deed, [he incorrectly concluded] the simple squeeze of a trigger would have spared the world a catastrophe which cost tens of millions of lives.

Since I claim Hitler’s grandfather could be found in the House that founded the Bavarian Illuminati then a satanic guardian angel would explain how he was able to volunteer repeatedly for dangerous missions and escape death over and over. Historians concluded “he lead a charmed life.”

Without the connection of WW I, WW II, Adolph Hitler and the Holocaust to The Modern State of Israel, then for Mark Weber and Toland, it was choice between:

A street cleaner who enjoyed having women defecate on him while taking over the world with the help of George H.W. Bush’s father; Or, the grandson of the Rothschilds who killed 55-70 million people for no apparent reason, other than a psychotic love for wars and suffering. [9]

Therefore John Toland and Mark Weber choose to make Hitler “more credible than he was” (sanitize) rather than confuse the world.

The Scofield Bible Fruit Loop

Mark knew that Samuel Untermeyer, New York attorney and Zionist leader, was instrumental in the financing of the Scofield Reference Bible. The influence of Cyrus Scofield and the Oxford Press on 20th Century Christian and Jewish sectarian beliefs is legendary. The Scofield Bible became the most important instrument for spreading the message of Christian Zionism: that the Modern State of Israel is the fulfillment of biblical prophecy.

However, with a straight “voice,” Mark countered that because Catholics are “Christians” and since there are millions of Catholics who don’t read or study any Bible, as opposed to a few hundred thousand evangelicals, “How could Untermeyer be sure the Scofield Bible would have the impact, that it in fact had, on Christian Zionism, and, of course on the United Nations when they gave Holocaust survivors the Palestinian’s land.”

After all, Mark countered: “there are many works of propaganda financed by The Global Financial Elite (TGFE) that haven’t changed history. Although he didn’t cite any.”

His argument is classic fruit loop and makes no sense, but it kept me on the defensive.

I tried to get him to discuss two related topics:

1.      The idiotic story in the history books about the Opium Wars and the end of the Manchu Dynasty. Were Opium Heads Responsible for the Downfall of China? 2.      The “Let them eat cake” phrase, which is misattributed to Marie Antoinette.

Mark hadn’t read Narcotic Culture: A History of Drugs in China by Frank Dikötter, Professor of the Modern History of China, University of London, that exposed the Opium Head myth:

“The image at the core of this Opium belief has rarely been examined, either at the time by contemporaries or more recently by historians because a variety of interests intersect to replicate it in different contexts.”

But Mark knew Marie Antoinette never said “Let them eat cake,” but thought it reflected the sentiment of the French Monarchy and a justification for another absurd story in our filtered history books about the French Revolution.

Revisionists are still trying to explain why the despots of our history books wouldn’t use the Guillotine to dispense with such a heretical movement.

When I began my story debunking the popular notion that the Enlightenment caused the Revolution makes the mistake of post hoc ergo propter hoc – “after the fact, therefore because of the fact.” Thus, Chartier and other historians claim it was the French Revolution that made the Enlightenment (The Cultural Origins of The French Revolution, Roger Chartier)…

Mark suddenly needed to get back to “bringing history into accord with [out the] facts.”

Robert Singer writes about Secrets, Sentient Creatures and The Federal Reserve at The Peoples Voice and The Market  Oracle

Footnotes: [1] The IHR mission statement:

For many years Israel has violated well established precepts of international law and has defied numerous United Nations resolutions in its occupation of conquered lands, in extra-judicial killings, and in its repeated acts of military aggression.

Most of the world regards Israel’s policies, and especially its oppression of Palestinians, as illegal and outrageous. This international consensus is reflected, for example, in numerous UN resolutions condemning Israel, which have been approved with overwhelming majorities.

The “unknown holocaust” – a “horrible era of destruction, looting, starvation, rape, ‘ethnic cleansing,’ and mass killing” in which some three million Germans died unnecessarily after the official end of the war in 1945 — about two million civilians, mostly women, children and elderly, and about one million prisoners of war.

This “‘unknown holocaust’ of non-Jews,” he said, “is essentially ignored not because the facts are disputed or unknown, but rather because this reality does not fit well with the Judeo-centric view of history that is all but obligatory in our society, a view of the past that reflects the Jewish-Zionist hold on our cultural and educational life.”

“Jews are only three percent of the nation’s population and comprise eleven percent of what this study defines as the nation’s elite. However, Jews constitute more than 25 percent of the elite journalists and publishers, more than 17 percent of the leaders of important voluntary and public interest organizations, and more than 15 percent of the top ranking civil servants.”

[2] May 24, 2010 Email From: Mark Weber To: Robert Singer Subject: Your message – April 12, 17 and May 20

Thanks, Robert, for your follow message of last Sunday.

You are right about my confusion on dates. I did not remember just when you and I first communicated or spoke by phone. What I said to you was a mistake.

And when I said that I was not aware of your writings before our first phone call (apparently on April 10), I may have simply meant that I did not specifically recall your writings, or connected them with you. I’d be glad to talk again. I certainly don’t want to be in a ‘state of denial.’ Regards, Mark Weber

[3] Part 1: The Modern State of Israel: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened

Part 2: World War I, II: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened

Part 3: Adolph Hitler: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened

Part 4: How did Hitler lose the war: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened

Part 5: The War to End All Wars: Providence, Pointless Tragedy or What Really Happened

Part 6: Adolph Hitler: War Hero, Street Cleaner, Prostitute or Secret Agent: A Psychohistory Analysis

[4] Some of the most important events in the twentieth century took years to accomplish, while others took only minutes. Twentieth century history is made up of both the large and the small events that shaped it, however Jennifer Rosenberg’s 20th Century History Guide does not include the creation of the State of Israel.

Designed for students, “Events That Changed the World in the Twentieth Century”, Edited by Frank W. Thackeray and John E. Findling is a unique resource that offers detailed descriptions and expert analysis of the 20th century’s most important events: World War I, the Russian Revolution, the Rise of Fascism, the Great Depression, World War II, the Cold War, the Chinese Revolution, the end of Colonialism and the Rise of the Third World, European unification, and the collapse of the Soviet union.

The creation of the State of Israel is not among the “Events That Changed the World in the Twentieth Century.”

In response to an inquiry from a Vassar College student publication, B.W. Van Norden wrote his opinion of “The Ten Most Important People of the 20th Century.”

His criteria for inclusion were how many people were influenced, and to how great an extent, by the event(s) associated with this person and would the event(s) associated with this person not have occurred, or would they have happened in a significantly different way, had this person not existed?  Adolph Hitler: WWII and the Holocaust are central events of this century. B.W. does not consider the creation of the State of Israel a central event of this century.

[5] In January 2009, Weber, the IHR’s director, released an essay titled, “How Relevant Is Holocaust Revisionism?”

In it he noted that Holocaust denial had attracted little support over the years: “It’s gotten some support in Iran, or places like that, but as far as I know, there is no history department supporting writing by these folks.” Accordingly, he recommended that emphasis be placed instead on opposing “Jewish-Zionist power”, which some commentators claim is a shift to a directly antisemitic position.

Mark realizes the six million figure was a systematic distortion of history that allows Israel, over the last 50 years, to violate international law and avoid punishment for its repeated acts of military aggression against the Arab states and the Palestinians.

THE NUREMBERG TRIALS The story of the Six Million was given judicial authority at the Nuremberg Trials of German leaders between 1945 and 1949, proceedings which proved to be the most disgraceful legal farce in history. For a far more detailed study of the iniquities of these trials, which as Field Marshal Montgomery said, made it a crime to lose a war, the reader is referred to the works cited below, and particularly to the outstanding book Advance to Barbarism (Nelson, 1953), by the distinguished English jurist, F. J. P. Veale. From the very outset, the Nuremberg Trials proceeded on the basis of gross statistical errors. In his speech of indictment on November 20th, 1945.

ABSENCE OF EVIDENCE It should be emphasised straight away that there is not a single document in existence which proves that the Germans intended to, or carried out, the deliberate murder of Jews. In Poliakov and Wulf’s Das Dritte Reich und die Juden: Dokumente und Aufsätze (Berlin, 1955), the most that they can assemble are statements extracted after the war from people like Hoettl, Ohlendorf and Wisliceny, the latter under torture in a Soviet prison. In the absence of any evidence, therefore, Poliakov is forced to write: “The three or four people chiefly involved in drawing up the plan for total extermination are dead, and no documents survive.” This seems very convenient. Quite obviously, both the plan and the “three or four” people are nothing but nebulous assumptions on the part of the writer, and are entirely unprovable.

[6] The History Of The House Of Rothschild by Andrew Hitchcock records the Rothschilds, behind all the social cataclysms in history, are also behind the Freemasons and the social justice movement.

[Authors Note: Lest anyone think the material contained herein is historical fiction, watch the History Channel documentary Mysteries of the Freemasons]

The House of Rothschild, the Illuminati and The Mysteries of the Freemasons

The “Illuminati” was a name used by a German sect that existed in the 15th century.

Dr. Adam Weishaupt, A Human Devil, was born on February 6, 1748, the son of a Jewish (Khazar) rabbi had been indoctrinated into Egyptian occult. He studied the power of the Eleusinian mysteries and the influence exerted by the secret cult of the Pythagoreans.

Weishaupt also studied the teachings of the Essenes, and acquired copies of the Kabal, The Major Key of Solomon and The Lesser Key of Solomon, which revealed how to conjure up demons and perform occult rituals.

On May 1, 1776, under the direction of the newly formed House of Rothschild, he united all the different occult groups and founded the Ancient Illuminated Seers of Bavaria, derived from Luciferian teachings, which became known as the Order of the Illuminati.

In 1776, one of those coincidences that don’t happen very often happened:

In 1777, Weishaupt joined the Eclectic Masonic lodge “Theodore of Good Counsel” in Munich, and near the end of 1778, he came up with the idea of merging the Illuminati and the Masons.

The Freemasons practiced the occult and professed to have the ‘light’ received from Satan. By the middle of 1779, the Freemasons were under the complete influence of the Illuminati and the Rosicrucian Order.

Rosicrucians believe that “true knowledge of the universe can only be known by the elite”, who in turn have a responsibility to share this knowledge with the masses.

Freemasonry uses the metaphors of operative stonemasons’ tools and implements, against the allegorical backdrop of the building of King Solomon’s Temple, to convey the knowledge to the masses.

The Mason’s system of morality, veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols, serve only one purpose. They keep the profane (masses), “who aren’t fornicating and reading the papers” [Albert Camus], busy deciphering the symbols and clues that lead nowhere… until the time of the end.

[7] The Global Financial Elite (TGFE, a variation of TPTB, a non-conspiracy term coined by G. William Domhoff, a Research Professor at the University of California [11]) are the Rothschilds of Europe, Lazard Freres (Eugene Meyer), Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Warburg Company, Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, the Rockefeller family, and the J.P. Morgan interests. These interests have merged and consolidated in recent years, so that the control is much more concentrated. National Bank of Commerce is now Morgan Guaranty Trust Company. Lehman Brothers has merged with Kuhn, Loeb & Co., First National Bank has merged with the National City Bank, and in the other eleven Federal Reserve Districts, these same shareholders indirectly own or control shares in those banks, with the other shares owned by the leading families in those areas who own or control the principal industries in these regions. The “local” families set up regional councils, on orders from New York, of such groups as the Council on Foreign Relations, The Trilateral Commission, and other instruments of control devised by their masters. They finance and control political developments in their area, name candidates, and are seldom successfully opposed in their plans. Secrets of the Federal Reserve, The London Connection, Eustace Mullins

From Breaking News: Nikola Tesla Testifies at NY Grand Jury on 9/11 http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Voices.php/2010/09/10/breaking-news-nikola-tesla-testifies-at–11 [Prosecutor Note: Normally I (Vincent Bugliosi) won’t take a conspiracy theory case especially one that is Metaphysical (Sartre didn't understand the word metaphysical). I spent the last eight years writing “Reclaiming History: The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy” where I poked fun of the JFK conspiracy theories. I agreed to prosecute this case because I read The Key to the Secret of the Universe, Part 2 by Robert Singer.

Mark’s comments about Hitler inspired Part 6: Adolph Hitler: War Hero, Street Cleaner, Prostitute or Secret Agent: A Psychohistory Analysis

Hannah Arendt in “Le systrme totalitaire” Paris. agrees with me and calls invading Russia insane. Bevin Alexander in How Hitler Could Have Won World War II: The Fatal Errors That Led To Nazi Defeat writes:

The Nazis turned straightforwardly useless into the harmful when, right in the middle of the war, despite the penury of building materials and of rolling stock, they erected huge and costly extermination factories and organized the transport of millions of people...the manifest contradiction between this behavior and military imperatives gives the entire undertaking a mad, chimerical air.

With the chance to cut off the Soviet lifeline of oil, and therefore any hope of Allied victory from the east, why did Hitler insist on dividing and weakening his army, which ultimately led to the horrible battle of Stalingrad?

With the opportunity to drive the British out of Egypt and occupy all of the Middle East, opening a Nazi door to the vast oil resources of the region, why did Hitler fail to move in just a few panzer divisions to handle such an easy but crucial maneuver?

[8] The following is condensed from the published article: May 31 Memorial Day 2010: Adolph Hitler and Pvt. Henry Tandey

The times that Hitler cheated death became a legend that has baffled historians ever since. He had narrowly escaped death an inordinate number of times, it was as if he led a charmed life.

From Adolf Hitler by John Toland p. 86,87.

“I was eating my dinner in a trench with several comrades. Suddenly a voice seemed to be saying to me, ‘Get up and go over there’, It was so clear and insistent that I obeyed mechanically, as if it had been a military order.

I rose at once to my feet and walked twenty yards along the trench, carrying my dinner in its tin can with me. Then I sat down to go on eating, my mind being once more at rest. Hardly had I done so when a flash and deafening report came from part of the trench I just left. A stray shell had burst over the group I had been sitting, and every member of it was killed.”

Louis Pauwels and Jacques Bergier’s The Morning Of The Magicians: Secret Societies, Conspiracies, And Vanished Civilizations, first published in 1960. When Louis Pauwels’s The Morning of the Magicians was first published in 1960, few people were aware of notions about extraterrestrial intervention in human affairs, the role of the occult in Hitler’s military strategies, or conspiracies involving alchemists, underground civilizations, or secretive Masters of history. Also reveals occult influences on the Nazis, explores the anomalous events collected by Charles Fort, the history of Fulcanelli and more. The occult aspect of the rise of Hitler is a VERY important part of the whole scenario, and regardless what other researchers might say, I do claim that behind the power of Hitler were the same old secret societies that have influenced this planet negatively throughout the eons. Some might say it was the psychiatrists, others might say it was something else, and they may all be right in one way or the other. But my point is – it’s the same thing. It all narrows down to the ancient Illuminati and the Mystery Schools.

The occult aspect of the Third Reich is something that has been quite suppressed in the media and in history books, so that’s the reason I feel the urge to bring it up:

Symbols of the Theosophical Society (notice the Swastika in the left logo and the right logo is the Sun disc, indicating worship of the Sun God)

[9] One of Hitler’s opponents in the Nazi Party, Otto Strasser, claimed that the Nazi dictator forced his niece Geli Raubal to urinate and defecate on him. Strasser, who fled Germany for his life, includes the allegations in his memoirs and was personally interviewed by Langer in the process of researching the wartime report.

Appendix Footnote 2.5

Germany Won World War I the First Time

By Robert Singer

The following excerpt from World War I, II: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened should have included Ted Lang’s The Zionist Connection – An Unholy Tripartite as the footnote for the last line:

WWI and the deed to Palestine

WWI  “the war to end all wars,” allegedly began in Europe over clashes for “spheres of influence.”

Gavrilo Princip, the 19-year-old assassin and member of the Black Hand secret society, envisioned the death of the Archduke as the key that would unlock the shackles binding his people to the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

The Serbian government kept a close watch on Black Hand activities and knew of the plot to kill the Archduke. The prime minister of Serbia, Nikola Pasic, gave instructions for the three men to be arrested and the Black Hander in charge of the plot was told to abort the mission but inexplicably neither order was carried out.

The War to End all wars ended twice, the first time Germany won and offered the losers a simple status quo and end of the war, with no punitive conditions. Then the losers were approached with an offer they should have refused.

The War to End all wars ended twice, the first time Germany won and offered the losers a simple status quo and end of the war, with no punitive conditions. [2.5]

Footnote 2.5 is relevant because of the recent article in the the NY Times about why the CIA was inept or just stupid when they created a “safe haven” for Nazis, believed to be of use to the US’ Cold War efforts.

Footnote:

[2.5] Germany Won World War I the First Time

1916 – July 1-November 18- the battle in Somme causes 1 million deaths, and no strategic gain. Things look bleak for the allies at this point in the war.

“Germany won World War I. The war was over, but prior to an acceptance of Germany’s offer of a simple status quo ante end to the war with no punitive, attendant conditions for the losers, namely Great Britain and France, the international banking community, through its Zionist representatives, approached the British, desperate to win the war, and offered Britain a deal.

The deal entailed that if the Zionist-led international banking cartel could arrange Britain’s victory, would Great Britain support a Zionist state later on when the right conditions presented themselves? Great Britain agreed to these terms, and as their part of the deal, the Zionist bankers would get the United States of America into the conflict and reverse the obvious outcome.” http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=23656 [Excerpt From Ted Lang’s The Zionist Connection - An Unholy Tripartite]

Ted Lang’s The Zionist Connection, while correct, missed the significance of the Battle of the Somme and the implications of Wilson’s May 27, 1916 speech, wherein he expressed the hope that “peace was close at hand” to be complete.

At first, President Wilson used every means at the disposal of a neutral power to offer his good offices to the belligerents. However, “his efforts met with no success. In fact, it increased bitterness, and brought about an extended use of propaganda upon both sides.” In 1915, American aloofness and neutrality were sorely tried both by Allied control of the sea lanes (which adversely affected foreign trade), and by the sinking, in May, of the British passenger ship, the Lusitania, by a German submarine. Many Americans were among those who lost their lives. This incident, as well as submarine warfare in general, brought the United States close to breaking with the Central Powers. The crisis subsided when the Central Powers pledged in May 1916 to restrict submarine warfare (before the battle of Somme they were trying to end the war). As American awareness of the war was growing in the Presidential election year of 1916, the President stepped up his peace efforts. On May 27, 1916, Wilson gave a speech in Washington at a rally held by the League to Enforce Peace. He expressed the hope that “peace was close at hand” and implied that the United States was ready to mediate and guarantee it. http://www.hungarian-history.hu/lib/tria/tria18.htm President Wilson campaigned for re-election with the slogan, “He kept us out of war.” Then on April 6, 1917, just ninety days after beginning his second term, he called upon Congress for a declaration of war in order to “make the world safe for democracy.”

Condensed from The War to End All Wars: Providence, Pointless Tragedy or What Really Happened:

Historical Revisionism (HR)

To fully understand Wilson’s about face and how the Battle of the Somme led to the creation of the State of Israel, requires we engage in historical revisionism (HR).

HR is the tradition begun by such distinguished historians as Harry Elmer Barnes, A.J.P. Taylor, Charles Tansill, Paul Rassinier and William H. Chamberlin and continues at The Institute for Historical Review (IHR).

I contacted The Institute’s director, Mark Weber by telephone.

Mark is a historian, lecturer, current affairs analyst and author. He holds a master’s degree in modern European history from Indiana University.

I offered a donation to acknowledge his work in bringing “history in accord with the facts” and offered him my Modern State of Israel series of articles.

Mark had a number of interesting comments/critiques of my four-part series on the Modern State of Israel. He admitted he might be nit-picking but thought my “outrageous statements required especially rigorous proof.”

Below are three of his comments (More in Appendix B, Speaking Engagement at The Institute for Historical Review**Cancelled**):

  1. Theodor Herzl’s famous quote, “There would be a Jewish State within fifty years” wasn’t prophetic because Herzl made a lot of predictions that didn’t come true [I can only find one: his prophecy of an end to anti-Semitism went unfulfilled]. [1]
  2. My definitions of Zionism (an organization of Jews who believed the Jewish people needed a nation of their own to escape persecution), and Judaism (Jews collectively who practice a religion based on the Torah and the Talmud) were not clear because “Zionism” is a movement and ideology not an organization and that “Judaism” is a religion not a collective. He highlights the enigma of Judaism: religion, a race, a culture or a nation?
  1. How could Rothschild be sure Germany would win World War I the first time which led to the Balfour declaration.

“How could Rothschild be sure Germany would win World War I the first time” is a trick question.

Mark will admit to the Balfour Declaration conspiracy:

Samuel Untermeyer blackmails Wilson with Mary Peck’s love letters in order to get Louis Dembitz Brandeis, the most politically influential of all Zionists in the United States appointed to the Supreme Court. Brandeis volunteered his opinion that the sinking of the S.S. Sussex by a German submarine in the English Channel justified the declaration of war against Germany. [2]

And Mark knows the Allies could have defeated Germany without grasping at the straw in the United States before, during, and after the battle of the Somme.

Therefore Mark knows the Germans didn’t win the battle of the Somme, the British went into the tank (pun intended) and took a dive.

How could Rothschild be sure of the outcome of the Battle of the Somme?

“…lumbering slowly towards us came three huge mechanical monsters such as we had never seen before.”

Simple, the Rothschilds, the hidden hand behind the belligerents in every conflict, operate out of their headquarters in the square-mile sovereign state in the heart of greater London, in 1916 only deployed tanks in limited numbers. [3]

Why didn’t the Rothschilds use tanks in greater numbers until after the U.S. entered the war?

Answer: Because the Jews would not have arrived in Haifa in 1948. The Key to the Secret of the Universe, Part 2

[End of condensed version of The War to End All Wars: Providence, Pointless Tragedy or What Really Happened]

Footnotes:

[1] Mark didn’t try the “he was off by one year” because he knew UN Resolution (GA 181) partitioned Palestine in 1947.

[2] Zionism – the Hidden Tyranny – Benjamin H. Freedman, The Greatest Story Never Told, Winston Churchill and the Crash of 1929 by Pat Riott, pg. 20

[3] Andrew Hitchcock, author of The History of the House of Rothschild.

“The Rothschilds have been in control of the world for a very long time, their tentacles reaching into many aspects of our daily lives, and are the hidden hand behind all the social cataclysms in history”

Wall Street & the Bolshevik Revolution by Antony C. Sutton. The World Order by Eustice Mullins, Boring, OR: CPA Book Publisher, 1985. The Power Of The Rothschilds By Fritz Springmeier (Excerpt – Bloodlines of the Illuminati, The History of the House of Rothschild by Andrew Hitchcock, 25.

The Battlefield Debut of the Tank was in 1916 and an EyeWitness to History writes:

The new weapon made its battlefield debut on September 15, 1916 when fifty of the machines joined the Battle of the Somme in a third attempt to attack and break through the German defenses. The attack failed – no breakthrough occurred. Only 35 of the tanks actually took part in the battle. Their presence shocked the enemy, but their practical impact was minimal due to a lack of effective tactics and numerous mechanical failures. But, the door to the future was opened and the first step taken in the development of a weapon that would dominate the battlefield of future wars.

Appendix Footnote 3.5

19th Century Anti-Semitism Revisited

By Robert Singer

The following excerpt from Adolph Hitler: Providence, Miracle, or What Really Happened should have included a footnote:

What is more unusual: on March 24 1933 the RothIsms without consulting Jews in Germany or for that matter Jews anywhere in the world, “Declare War On Germany” on the front page of the London Daily Express. We know they did not consult German Jews because since the Emancipation Edict of 1822, Jews were guaranteed all civil rights enjoyed by Germans.  You can guess which country offered Jews a refuge from Russia when the Communist coup failed in 1905… Germany. [3.5]

[Footnote 3.5 is relevant because of the recent article in the the NY Times about why the CIA was inept or just stupid when they created a "safe haven" for Nazis, believed to be of use to the US' Cold War efforts.]

Footnote:
[3.5] “Since the Emancipation Edict of 1822, Jews were guaranteed all civil rights enjoyed by Germans”

The common explanation is that the Germans have always been anti-Semites, but history tells otherwise: Jews experienced a period of legal equality from 1848 until the rise of Nazi Germany. German Jews enjoyed full equality in the Weimar Republic, many receiving high political positions like foreign minister and vice chancellor. The Weimar constitution was the work of a German Jew, Hugo Preuss, who later became minister of the interior. Marriages between Jews and non-Jews became somewhat common from the 19th century; for example, the wife of German Chancellor Gustav Stresemann was Jewish. By the end of the 1920s, most German Jews were fully integrated into German society, living as German citizens with German interests. They served in the German army and contributed to every field of German science, business and culture. Out of the two and a half million Jewish victims of the Nazis which sought refuge abroad between 1935 and 1943, hardly 8.5% went to settle in Palestine. The United States limited their number to 182,000 allowed to enter US soil (less than 7%); England limited the number to 67,000 (less than 2%). The vast majority (1,930,000),in other words 75% found shelter in the Soviet Union. Source: Institute for Jewish Affairs of New York, quoted by Christopher Sykes in “Crossroads to Israel”, London 1965, and by Nathan Weinstock, “Le sionisme contre Israel,” p.146.

“You can guess which country offered Jews a refuge from Russia when the Communist coup failed in 1905”

Materials in the Nicolaevsky and Okhrana collections document the climate of anti-Semitism prevalent in parts of the Russian empire during the 1905 period and afterwards, including newspaper accounts of pogroms and trials of Jewish personalities and reactions to these events in both the European press and the publications of the émigré Russian revolutionary movement. The archives also have a copy of the notorious police forgery, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, that was used to inflame opinion against the Jews in the Russian empire and elsewhere, and is still used in anti-Semitic propaganda today.

The Germans, naturally, felt they had been betrayed by their Jewish population. This is because, at the time the Rothschilds’ made their deal with Britain for Palestine, in exchange for bringing America into the war, Germany was the most friendly country in the world towards the Jews, indeed the German Emancipation Edict of 1822 guaranteed Jews in Germany all civil rights enjoyed by Germans.

Also, Germany was the only country in Europe which did not place restrictions on Jews, even giving them refuge when they had to flee from Russia after their first attempted Communist coup failed there in 1905.

1882 -1913: 1.5 million Jews left Russia. Total: 2 million Jews left Eastern Europe and Russia between 1880 and 1914. Many the Jews went through Germany (1.2 million) and some stayed there (78.000).

Nevertheless, Palestine is confirmed as a Jewish homeland, and whilst its handover to the Rothschilds’ takes place it is to remain under the control of Britain as the Rothschilds’ control Britain. At the time less than one percent of the population of Palestine is Jewish. Interestingly, the host of the Versailles peace conference is its Jewish boss, Baron Edmond de Rothschild.  [History of the House of Rothschild - Andrew Hitchcock] Judaica part 2 — Jews and Politics in the 20th Century

Aid organization: anti-Zionist Hilfsverein (Relief Organization)
[From the Encyclopaedia Judaica]

The Kishinev pogrom marked a turning point in modern Jewish history, as the historian Simon Dubnow wrote in his memoirs. This pogrom and ensuing ones demonstrated beyond a doubt that Tsarist Russia could not or would not protect its Jewish subjects. Immediately after the Kishinev Pogrom, a self-defense movement sprang up, with individual groups forming in communities throughout the Russian Empire. A sharp rise in emigration from Russia to America followed the pogrom, in keeping with the mass departures after the pogroms of the early 1880s.

After the Kishinev pogrom, the Hilfsverein called the Vienna Conference of 1903 to organize relief of Russian Jewry, and a similar conference in London in 1905. During the 1905 revolution in Russia it gave financial help to the self-defense groups of the [[Social-Democrat]] Bund and [[racist]] Zionists.

Within the big anti-Semitism waves in Europe (provoked by “nationalism”) the Hilfsverein was first promoting Jewish installations in Palestine, but then it turned against Zionism and was an island of help for the Jews. It was a help for independent emigration without racist Zionist orders and without the war trap of Palestine as a emigration destination]].

From 1905 to 1914 the Hilfsverein (col. 479) published a weekly, Russische Korrespondenz [[Russian Correspondence]], in German, English, and French, on the position of the Jews and the liberal and revolutionary movements in Russia. [[The indication of the ideology of the Jews is missing]]. Following a policy of assisting only “organized emigration” of Rumanian [[Romanian]] Jews, the Hilfsverein decided in 1902 not to help those emigrants who were stranded in [[racist kaiser]] Germany, but instead to help the Jews in Rumania itself. The Hilfsverein became the agent of Jacob *Schiff’s project to help Russian Jews to emigrate to the southern United States (the Galveston plan), but in view of the autocratic nature of the German [[racist kaiser]] regime was unwilling and unable to assist Jewish emigration to [[racist kaiser]] Germany.

On the eve of World War I the Hilfsverein had over 10,000 members in [[racist kaiser]] Germany, and followers in America, Russia, and Palestine.

[WW I: sharp conflicts with racist Zionists - collaboration with Joint - dominating racist Zionism since 1919]

During the war the Hilfsverein assisted in interdenominational relief work in the occupied territories in eastern Europe and distributed American relief funds. However, the assimilationist policy of the Hilfsverein and its eastern European agencies provoked sharp conflicts with the [[racist]] Zionists and other anti-assimilationist groups. As a result the *American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee began to participate to a greater degree in the allocation of funds formally channeled through the Hilfsverein.

After the defeat of Germany, the Hilfsverein ceased to play a major role in international Jewish matters  [[because in 1917 racist Empire Britain gave the Balfour Declaration, and because the Paris peace conference had acknowledged the Jewish religion as a "nation" and by this, the racist national Jewish Zionists were more and more dominating all Jewish communities]] but joined the Alliance and other non-Zionist organization, though it refused to take part in the efforts for united Jewish representation at the League of Nations.

[About 350,000 Jews emigrated by Hilfsverein from 1921 to 1936 - local aid work in Germany since 1933 - anti-Zionist Hilfsverein advises to postpone emigration - all emigration destinations but Palestine - end in 1941 - over 90,000 Jews emigrated by Hilfsverein to overseas countries 1933-1941]

Through its 290 local committees in Germany (in 1930), the Hilfsverein concentrated mainly on helping Jewish emigration from and via Germany (about 350,000 between 1921 and 1936). After the advent of the Nazi Reich, the Hilfsverein (which in 1935 had to change its name to Hilfsverein der Juden in Deutschland, “Relief Organization of Jews in Germany”) was unable to continue with relief work abroad. The Hilfsverein initially advised German Jewry to postpone emigration as long as possible but was forced by circumstances to aid those who wished to leave for destinations other than Palestine. It was officially dissolved in 1939 though it continued to exist until 1941 as an emigration section of the *Reichsvertretung der Juden in Deutschland [[Reich Deputation of German Jews]].

Between 1933 and 1941 the Hilfsverein assisted over 90,000 persons to emigrate to overseas countries, with the exception of Palestine. Leading personalities of the Hilfsverein were James *Simon (president until 1932), Eugen *Landau, Paul *Nathan, and Max M. *Warburg.

[[It's a pity that precise emigration data for every year and destination are missing. The relations to the Arabs as a non-Zionist organization is not mentioned either. It seems that the Hilfsverein knew about Middle East Conflict and did not want to lead the Jews into the war trap in Palestine]].

Bibliography: – Festschrift anlaesslich der Feier des 25-jaehrigen Bestehens des Hilfsvereins (1926) – Z. Szajkowski, in: JSOS, 13 (1951), 47-70; 19 (1957), 29-50; 22 (1960), 131-58 – idem, in: YLBI, 9 (1964), 131-58 – Kahn, in: Die Arbeit des Hilfsvereins … (1931), 77-82 – E. Feder, in: HJ, 14 (1952), 3-26 – E. Cohen: Mi-Zikhronot Ish Yerushalayim, 2 vols. (1933-36) [[...]] > (col. 480)